Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Rialto
This post compares Lancaster, California to Rialto, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Rialto (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 102,708 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $35,478 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $260,200 |
| White | 62% | 61% |
| Black | 21% | 12% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 42% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 46% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Rialto?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Rialto: 160113 compared with 102708 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Rialto?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Rialto?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 36% for Rialto.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z