Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Redlands
This post compares Lancaster, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $350,900 |
| White | 62% | 71% |
| Black | 21% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 42% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Redlands?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Redlands: 160113 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z