Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Lancaster, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $444,200 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 21% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Lancaster has a similar population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 160113 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z