Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Porterville
This post compares Lancaster, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $163,100 |
| White | 62% | 77% |
| Black | 21% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 46% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Porterville?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Porterville: 160113 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z