Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Lancaster, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $633,400 |
| White | 62% | 75% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Pleasant Hill?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 160113 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z