Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Pico Rivera
This post compares Lancaster, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $380,200 |
| White | 62% | 55% |
| Black | 21% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 3% |
| With Kids | 42% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 36 |
| Rentals | 46% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Pico Rivera?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 160113 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z