Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Pasadena
This post compares Lancaster, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $689,700 |
| White | 62% | 53% |
| Black | 21% | 10% |
| Asian | 4% | 16% |
| With Kids | 42% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 46% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Pasadena?
A: Lancaster has a similar population count than Pasadena: 160113 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z