Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Palm Springs
This post compares Lancaster, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $340,600 |
| White | 62% | 83% |
| Black | 21% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 42% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 54 |
| Rentals | 46% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Palm Springs?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 160113 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z