Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Newark
This post compares Lancaster, California to Newark, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Newark (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 45,554 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $55,190 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $607,200 |
| White | 62% | 33% |
| Black | 21% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 30% |
| With Kids | 42% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 46% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Newark?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Newark: 160113 compared with 45554 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Newark?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Newark?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 30% for Newark.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z