Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Laguna Hills
This post compares Lancaster, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $649,700 |
| White | 62% | 69% |
| Black | 21% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 42% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 41 |
| Rentals | 46% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Laguna Hills?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Laguna Hills: 160113 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z