Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Fresno
This post compares Lancaster, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Fresno (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 160,113 | 519,037 |
Income (median) | $42,993 | $39,069 |
Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $206,800 |
White | 62% | 56% |
Black | 21% | 7% |
Asian | 4% | 13% |
With Kids | 42% | 41% |
Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
Rentals | 46% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Fresno?
A: Lancaster has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 160113 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z