Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Foothill Farms
This post compares Lancaster, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $201,200 |
| White | 62% | 67% |
| Black | 21% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 42% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Foothill Farms?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 160113 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z