Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Eureka
This post compares Lancaster, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $249,300 |
| White | 62% | 75% |
| Black | 21% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 42% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 46% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Eureka?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Eureka: 160113 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z