Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Eastvale
This post compares Lancaster, California to Eastvale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Eastvale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 59,733 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $61,490 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $496,000 |
| White | 62% | 42% |
| Black | 21% | 8% |
| Asian | 4% | 26% |
| With Kids | 42% | 57% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Eastvale?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Eastvale: 160113 compared with 59733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Eastvale?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Eastvale?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 24% for Eastvale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z