Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Lancaster, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $154,600 |
| White | 62% | 70% |
| Black | 21% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 2% |
| With Kids | 42% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 34 |
| Rentals | 46% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 160113 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z