Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Culver City
This post compares Lancaster, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $735,600 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 21% | 7% |
| Asian | 4% | 15% |
| With Kids | 42% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Culver City?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Culver City: 160113 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z