Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Cudahy
This post compares Lancaster, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Cudahy (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 24,146 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $26,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $327,500 |
| White | 62% | 77% |
| Black | 21% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 0% |
| With Kids | 42% | 60% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 27 |
| Rentals | 46% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Cudahy?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Cudahy: 160113 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z