Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Claremont
This post compares Lancaster, California to Claremont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Claremont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 35,949 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $75,241 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $605,700 |
| White | 62% | 65% |
| Black | 21% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 42% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Claremont?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Claremont: 160113 compared with 35949 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Claremont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Claremont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 34% for Claremont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z