Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Chino Hills
This post compares Lancaster, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 160,113 | 78,025 |
Income (median) | $42,993 | $66,607 |
Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $567,200 |
White | 62% | 46% |
Black | 21% | 4% |
Asian | 4% | 33% |
With Kids | 42% | 41% |
Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
Rentals | 46% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Chino Hills?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Chino Hills: 160113 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z