Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Campbell
This post compares Lancaster, California to Campbell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Campbell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 41,164 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $76,436 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $884,600 |
| White | 62% | 65% |
| Black | 21% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 42% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 50% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Campbell?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Campbell: 160113 compared with 41164 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Campbell?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Campbell?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Campbell does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 50% for Campbell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z