Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Burlingame
This post compares Lancaster, California to Burlingame, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Burlingame (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 30,401 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $93,145 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $1,591,600 |
| White | 62% | 61% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 24% |
| With Kids | 42% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Burlingame?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Burlingame: 160113 compared with 30401 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Burlingame?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Burlingame?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burlingame does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 52% for Burlingame.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z