Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Burbank
This post compares Lancaster, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $574,300 |
| White | 62% | 70% |
| Black | 21% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 42% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Burbank?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Burbank: 160113 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z