Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Beverly Hills
This post compares Lancaster, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 62% | 82% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 42% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 43 |
| Rentals | 46% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Beverly Hills?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 160113 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z