Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Bell
This post compares Lancaster, California to Bell, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Bell (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 35,942 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $28,916 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $352,000 |
| White | 62% | 75% |
| Black | 21% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 42% | 53% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 30 |
| Rentals | 46% | 70% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Bell?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Bell: 160113 compared with 35942 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Bell?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Bell?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 70% for Bell.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z