Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Baldwin Park
This post compares Lancaster, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $357,500 |
| White | 62% | 34% |
| Black | 21% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 18% |
| With Kids | 42% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Baldwin Park?
A: Lancaster has a larger population count than Baldwin Park: 160113 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Lancaster versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z