Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lancaster to Ashland
This post compares Lancaster, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lancaster (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160,113 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $42,993 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $213,100 | $396,400 |
| White | 62% | 44% |
| Black | 21% | 17% |
| Asian | 4% | 20% |
| With Kids | 42% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lancaster or Ashland?
A: Lancaster has a much larger population count than Ashland: 160113 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lancaster or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Lancaster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lancaster or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Lancaster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Lancaster versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lancaster may include: Barstow, Victorville, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z