Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Lake Forest, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,812 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $64,458 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $322,800 |
| White | 67% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 10% |
| With Kids | 34% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or South San Jose Hills?
A: Lake Forest has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 81812 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lake Forest does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Lake Forest versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z