Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to South San Francisco
This post compares Lake Forest, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,812 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $64,458 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $697,400 |
White | 67% | 33% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 15% | 39% |
With Kids | 34% | 34% |
Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or South San Francisco?
A: Lake Forest has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 81812 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Lake Forest versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z