Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to South Pasadena
This post compares Lake Forest, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,812 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $64,458 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $928,500 |
White | 67% | 54% |
Black | 2% | 3% |
Asian | 15% | 29% |
With Kids | 34% | 34% |
Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or South Pasadena?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 81812 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Lake Forest versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z