Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to Riverbank
This post compares Lake Forest, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,812 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $64,458 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $247,200 |
| White | 67% | 79% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or Riverbank?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than Riverbank: 81812 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Lake Forest versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z