Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to Porterville
This post compares Lake Forest, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,812 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $64,458 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $163,100 |
| White | 67% | 77% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 34% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 30% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or Porterville?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than Porterville: 81812 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Lake Forest versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z