Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to Pico Rivera
This post compares Lake Forest, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,812 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $64,458 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $380,200 |
| White | 67% | 55% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 3% |
| With Kids | 34% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 30% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or Pico Rivera?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 81812 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 30% for Lake Forest versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z