Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to Eureka
This post compares Lake Forest, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | Eureka (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,812 | 27,024 |
Income (median) | $64,458 | $33,280 |
Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $249,300 |
White | 67% | 75% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 15% | 7% |
With Kids | 34% | 23% |
Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or Eureka?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than Eureka: 81812 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Lake Forest versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z