Compare-Cities.com
Compare Lake Forest to Beverly Hills
This post compares Lake Forest, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Lake Forest (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 81,812 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $64,458 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $585,100 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 67% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 9% |
| With Kids | 34% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 30% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Lake Forest or Beverly Hills?
A: Lake Forest has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 81812 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Lake Forest or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Lake Forest.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Lake Forest or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Lake Forest.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Lake Forest versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Lake Forest may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Laguna-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z