Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to South San Francisco
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 69% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 39% |
| With Kids | 31% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or South San Francisco?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 31235 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z