Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $374,600 |
| White | 69% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 3% |
| With Kids | 31% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 38 |
| Rentals | 29% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Laguna Hills has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 31235 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z