Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to South El Monte
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $389,400 |
| White | 69% | 59% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 14% |
| With Kids | 31% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or South El Monte?
A: Laguna Hills has a larger population count than South El Monte: 31235 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z