Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to San Francisco
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,235 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $58,400 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $927,400 |
White | 69% | 47% |
Black | 2% | 5% |
Asian | 14% | 34% |
With Kids | 31% | 18% |
Age (median) | 41 | 38 |
Rentals | 29% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or San Francisco?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 31235 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z