Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to San Bruno
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $754,700 |
| White | 69% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 28% |
| With Kids | 31% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or San Bruno?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 31235 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z