Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Porterville
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Porterville (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,235 | 58,782 |
Income (median) | $58,400 | $36,312 |
Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $163,100 |
White | 69% | 77% |
Black | 2% | 0% |
Asian | 14% | 4% |
With Kids | 31% | 48% |
Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
Rentals | 29% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Porterville?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than Porterville: 31235 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z