Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Pittsburg
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $324,500 |
| White | 69% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 16% |
| Asian | 14% | 17% |
| With Kids | 31% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 35 |
| Rentals | 29% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Pittsburg?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 31235 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z