Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Pico Rivera
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,235 | 63,750 |
Income (median) | $58,400 | $36,529 |
Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $380,200 |
White | 69% | 55% |
Black | 2% | 0% |
Asian | 14% | 3% |
With Kids | 31% | 42% |
Age (median) | 41 | 36 |
Rentals | 29% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Pico Rivera?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 31235 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pico Rivera does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z