Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Palm Springs
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $340,600 |
| White | 69% | 83% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 31% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 54 |
| Rentals | 29% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Palm Springs?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 31235 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z