Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Oakley
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Oakley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Oakley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 39,950 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $58,451 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $356,000 |
| White | 69% | 61% |
| Black | 2% | 8% |
| Asian | 14% | 7% |
| With Kids | 31% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Oakley?
A: Laguna Hills has a similar population count than Oakley: 31235 compared with 39950 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Oakley?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Oakley?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Laguna Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 24% for Oakley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z