Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to National City
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $345,400 |
| White | 69% | 61% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 14% | 19% |
| With Kids | 31% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 29% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or National City?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than National City: 31235 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or National City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z