Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Fresno
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Fresno (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,235 | 519,037 |
Income (median) | $58,400 | $39,069 |
Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $206,800 |
White | 69% | 56% |
Black | 2% | 7% |
Asian | 14% | 13% |
With Kids | 31% | 41% |
Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
Rentals | 29% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Fresno?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 31235 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z