Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Foster City
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 69% | 43% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 47% |
| With Kids | 31% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
| Rentals | 29% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Foster City?
A: Laguna Hills has a similar population count than Foster City: 31235 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z