Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Foothill Farms
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $201,200 |
| White | 69% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 14% | 5% |
| With Kids | 31% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 29% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Foothill Farms?
A: Laguna Hills has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 31235 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z