Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Fairfield
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $341,500 |
| White | 69% | 46% |
| Black | 2% | 14% |
| Asian | 14% | 17% |
| With Kids | 31% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 34 |
| Rentals | 29% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Fairfield?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 31235 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z