Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Eastvale
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Eastvale, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Eastvale (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 59,733 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $61,490 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $496,000 |
| White | 69% | 42% |
| Black | 2% | 8% |
| Asian | 14% | 26% |
| With Kids | 31% | 57% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 33 |
| Rentals | 29% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Eastvale?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than Eastvale: 31235 compared with 59733 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Eastvale?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Eastvale?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Laguna Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 24% for Eastvale.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z